Watch the video
Originally published on LinkedIn · August 24, 2026 · Jeff Mays
The real opportunity isn’t faster website production. It’s a recurring service built around an initial audit, monthly reporting, and the client relationships agencies already have.
Something useful happened this week.
Instead of trying to guess what web designers and agency owners are thinking about AI, I started getting direct answers.
One web designer described AI as compressing the first 60 percent of a website build. Layouts, boilerplate, and first drafts are getting faster.
But specifications, edge cases, client decisions, and waiting for the client’s content have not magically disappeared.
Another agency professional asked the bigger question:
If websites become faster and cheaper to produce, where does dependable recurring agency revenue come from?
That is the question I think agencies should be asking now.
Faster Production Is Not a New Business Model
AI can make parts of a website project more efficient. That is valuable.
It may help a small agency complete more work with fewer people. It may improve margins. It may allow a solo operator to deliver work that once required a larger team.
But there is another side to that efficiency.
If every agency has access to similar tools, faster production can also create more price pressure. The client may not care that the first draft took six hours instead of three days. They care whether the finished site works for the business.
Using AI to build the same website faster may improve the delivery process.
It does not automatically give the client another reason to keep paying the agency every month.
That reason has to come from continuing value.
Six Months Ago, the Opportunity Looked Like AI Visibility
When I started researching this market, the obvious question was whether a business appeared when someone asked ChatGPT, Google AI, Perplexity, or another AI platform for a recommendation.
We called that AI visibility.
Visibility still matters, but I no longer think it describes the whole opportunity.
The bigger issue is the business’s complete AI presence:
Is the business being found?
Is it being understood correctly?
Is it being recommended for the right services and locations?
Which competitors are appearing instead?
What information or evidence may be missing?
What changed since the last review?
That is why my thinking has moved from AI visibility toward AI Presence Management.
You may hear this work described as AEO, GEO, AI search optimization, or AI visibility. Those are all parts of the developing market.
AI Presence Management is the broader ongoing responsibility: establish the baseline, improve the appropriate signals, monitor what changes, and decide what should happen next.
This Builds on Work Agencies Already Do
Most agencies already have several recurring revenue streams.
They may provide website care, hosting, SEO, Google Business Profile management, reputation management, content, email marketing, or social media services.
AI Presence Management does not make those services obsolete. It helps connect them to a new client question:
How is AI understanding and recommending my business?
The answer may lead to website work. It may reveal inconsistent business information, weak service pages, missing third-party evidence, reputation gaps, local problems, technical issues, or an abandoned social presence.
The appropriate work will be different for every client, and agencies should stay within the areas they are qualified to handle.
That makes this a service built on top of the website and the existing agency relationship—not a completely separate business the agency has to build from scratch.
The Simple Recurring-Service Model
I do not think agencies need to make this complicated.
The process can be straightforward:
Run an initial audit for a client the agency already knows.
Show the client the most important gaps and competitive context.
Complete a focused Quick-Win project using work the agency is qualified to perform.
Place the client into a recurring review and reporting cadence.
Discuss what changed, what was completed, what remains open, and what should happen next.
The initial audit starts the conversation.
The recurring process creates the ongoing service.
Reporting May Be the Real Differentiator
One of the most useful comments I received was that clients may initially place AI Presence Management in the same mental bucket as SEO.
That is probably true.
The comment went one step further: the reporting is what may pull it out of that bucket.
Even when an agency is doing excellent SEO work, the report can feel like a black box to the client. They see rankings, traffic charts, or a list of completed tasks, but they may still wonder what the work means and what happens next.
A useful AI Presence Management report should make the conversation easier.
The initial report establishes the baseline. It shows how the business is currently being found and understood, what evidence supports the findings, which competitors are appearing, where meaningful gaps exist, and what should be considered first.
The Monthly Impact Report continues the story. It helps the agency show:
What changed during the period
What work was completed
Where movement was observed
Which gaps remain
What the next priorities should be
Which work is included in the monthly service or needs a separate scope
That does not guarantee that a score will rise every month. It does not guarantee that an AI platform will recommend the business. No honest agency should promise either one.
It gives the agency and client a consistent way to review observable evidence and make the next decision.
For anyone who wants to see the difference, these are the two report formats we use inside RediForAI:
The platform generates the reports under the agency’s brand. The agency reviews the information, applies its judgment, and presents it to the client.
The software produces the document.
The agency owns the relationship and the conversation.
The Relationship Is Still the Most Valuable Part
I spent 15 years running a local insurance agency. One of the biggest lessons I learned was that people often changed companies because of price, but they stayed because of personal service and attention.
That lesson still applies.
A web agency may have clients it has served for years. It understands the business, the website, the history, and the decision-maker. The client already knows who to call when something changes.
That trust is difficult for a new AI tool or an unfamiliar provider to replace.
AI can help produce the analysis. It can make reporting easier. It can help the agency work more efficiently.
But somebody still has to explain what matters, recommend the appropriate work, answer questions, and remain accountable to the client.
That is where I believe the recurring value shows up.
The Question I Am Still Asking
The opportunity is not simply to build the same websites faster.
It is to use the relationship the agency already has to help the client understand a new problem, complete appropriate work, and see what is changing over time.
AI Presence Management may still be an unfamiliar name. The responsibility behind it is becoming easier to see.
What do you currently show your clients each month to demonstrate the value of your ongoing work?